Re: Missing compat_43 stuff for netbsd32?

[Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost>]

Le 11/09/2018 à 10:07, Paul Goyette a écrit :
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > Le 11/09/2018 à 09:46, Paul Goyette a écrit :
> > > While working on the compat code, I noticed that there are a few old
> > > syscalls which are defined in syc/compat/netbsd323/syscalls.master
> > > with a type of COMPAT_43, yet there does not exist any compat_netbsd32
> > > implementation as far as I can see...
> > >
> > >      #64    ogetpagesize
> > >      #84    owait
> > >      #89    ogetdtablesize
> > >      #108    osigvec
> > >      #142    ogethostid (interestingly, there _is_ an implementation
> > >              for osethostid!)
> > >      #149    oquota
> > >
> > > Does any of this really matter?  Should we attempt to implement them?
> >
> > This would be silly. If no one noticed they weren't there, then it likely
> > means no one has ever used them; and if so, then we shouldn't add them - ie
> > we shouldn't introduce new entry points in the kernel. I mean we are in
> > 2018.
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Is there any problem/issue with leaving the type field set to COMPAT_43
> rather than UNIMPL or OBSOL ?

I don't have any particular opinion on that