Re: Why do we need lua in-tree again? Yet another call for actual evidence, please. (was Re: Moving Lua source codes)

[Yann Sionneau <yann.sionneau%gmail.com@localhost>]

Le 19/10/13 00:47, Marc Balmer a écrit :
> Am 19.10.13 00:14, schrieb Aleksej Saushev:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm of opinion that this device driver can and should stay outside the tree
> > until its utility can be demonstrated without this much strain.
> > At last this is one of the reasons why we support kernel modules.
> The inclusion and use of Lua in base, for use in userland and the
> kernel, has been the subject to public discussion, it has been the topic
> of a GSoC project, it has been presented at many conferences, it is well
> received by the community at large, it has users, it has attracted new
> users to NetBSD,
I would like to underline the "attracted new users to NetBSD" with an 
e-mail thread I've just read on DragonFly BSD kernel mailing list: 
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/kernel/2013-October/063013.htm

It seems true that Lua support is attractive to users and developers :)
Best regards,

--
Yann Sionneau