[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Why do we need lua in-tree again? Yet another call for actual evidence, please. (was Re: Moving Lua source codes)
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Marc Balmer wrote:
The inclusion and use of Lua in base, for use in userland and
the kernel, [...] has, last but not least, core's blessing.
Would you please either present some evidence for that claim, or
stop making the claim.
To the best of my knowledge, userland Lua was approved by core in
2010, but kernel Lua has never been approved by core.
Can we now please stop this useless discussion?
People will continue to ask questions until they receive some
--apb (Alan Barrett)
Main Index |
Thread Index |