[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost (Mouse) writes:
>>>> things. What I care about is the largest size "sector" that will (in
>>>> the ordinary course of things anyway) be written atomically.
>>> Then those are 512-byte-sector drives [...]
>> No; because I can do 4K atomic writes, I want to know about that.
>And, can't you do that with traditional drives, drives which really do
>have 512-byte sectors? Do a 4K transfer and you write 8 physical
>sectors with no opportunity for any other operation to see the write
>partially done. Is that wrong, or am I missing something else?
The drive could partially complete the write, i.e. if one of the
latter sectors has a write error or if the drive is powered down
in the middle of the operation.
Sure, you would know about it. But in case of a crash you can't rely
on data consistency.
Michael van Elst
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Main Index |
Thread Index |