Disc block size (was: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems)

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Disc block size (was: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems)
From: Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:02:30 +0100

> Is that wrong, or am I missing something else?
Well, I guess that you could end up with the third 512b-block failing and so 
your 4k chunk written halfway through. Whoever cares about that.

References:
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: J. Hannken-Illjes
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: David Laight
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: David Laight
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: Mouse
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: Mouse
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
  - From: Mouse

Prev by Date: Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Next by Date: Re: Making forced unmounts work
Previous by Thread: Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Next by Thread: Re: Problem identified: WAPL/RAIDframe performance problems
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index