[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: quotactl permissions
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:14:11PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> > > > > > Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
> > > > >
> > > > > The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
> > > >
> > > > It fixes the test case, but it is still wrong. This UID check
> > > > needs to be implemented in the kauth listener (adding a specific
> > > > case for this action if there's not one) not open-coded in the UFS
> > code.
> > >
> > > Here's a (completely untested) patch that should do that.
> > ...I don't think the check belongs in secmodel_suser.c, does it?
> > Or is that the general dumping ground for standard Unix security
> > semantics?
> I don't know. I just used the only place where the KAUTH_SYSTEM_FS_QUOTA
> request was implemented.
Yeah, I think it's supposed to be somewhere else. It should be handled
the same way owner access to files is, I guess, but I have no idea
what that is.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |