[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: quotactl permissions
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:10:33PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:00:47PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> > > > > Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
> > > >
> > > > The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
> > >
> > > It fixes the test case, but it is still wrong. This UID check
> > > needs to be implemented in the kauth listener (adding a specific
> > > case for this action if there's not one) not open-coded in the UFS code.
> > Here's a (completely untested) patch that should do that.
> ...I don't think the check belongs in secmodel_suser.c, does it?
> Or is that the general dumping ground for standard Unix security semantics?
I don't know. I just used the only place where the KAUTH_SYSTEM_FS_QUOTA
request was implemented.
Main Index |
Thread Index |