Re: quotactl permissions

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:00:47PM -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
 > > > > Changing it to effective uid seems like a good plan.
 > > > 
 > > > The change below fixes the test case. Is it safe to commit?
 > > 
 > > It fixes the test case, but it is still wrong.  This UID check
 > > needs to be implemented in the kauth listener (adding a specific
 > > case for this action if there's not one) not open-coded in the UFS code.
 > 
 > Here's a (completely untested) patch that should do that.

...I don't think the check belongs in secmodel_suser.c, does it?

Or is that the general dumping ground for standard Unix security semantics?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost