Re: RAIDframe component replacement

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:48:24AM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > then, after replacing the failed sd0 with the new sd0
> But with scsictl detach/scan, I suppose?

if the remplaceemnt drive is identical, you don't need to detach/reattach

> I've done this several times with non-hotpluggable SCSI hardware where I had 
> to power off anyway. But with SCA, I'm unsure, whether, after detaching sd0 
> (and sd1 still there), a newly scanned sd will become sd0 or sd2?

it should still be sd0

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--