Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed to follow

[Lars Heidieker <lars%heidieker.de@localhost>]

On 04/03/11 01:36, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:49:14 +0200
> Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>>> AFAIK dtrace doesn't work on non-modular kernels ...
>> Nor on most of our archs, and AFAICT there is not even a document 
>> describing the (maybe nontrivial amount of) work needed to make it
>> work there.
> I don't think that we should leave the tracking for a hypothetical
> future; it'd be better if the interface, or implementation, allowed to
> do such tracking....

Just an Idea, how about giving the kmem allocator a pool like logging...