Re: extent-patch and overview of what is supposed to follow

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:36:37PM +0200, Lars Heidieker wrote:
> On 04/03/11 01:36, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:49:14 +0200
> > Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >>> AFAIK dtrace doesn't work on non-modular kernels ...
> >> Nor on most of our archs, and AFAICT there is not even a document 
> >> describing the (maybe nontrivial amount of) work needed to make it
> >> work there.
> > I don't think that we should leave the tracking for a hypothetical
> > future; it'd be better if the interface, or implementation, allowed to
> > do such tracking....
> 
> Just an Idea, how about giving the kmem allocator a pool like logging...

or malloc(9)-like :)

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--