[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: libquota proposal
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 03:45:45AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to
> > > be supported.
> > of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling the
> > legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab
> > options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota.
> I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your
> proplib interface now?
We were talking about code like netatalk, which is why I propose
a public library for this.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |