[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: libquota proposal
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:21:22PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > That's a bug, or more accurately legacy behavior that doesn't need to
> > be supported.
> of course it's not nice. But we're talking about existing code calling the
> legacy quotactl. If we're going to change it to not check the fstab
> options any more, we may as well change it to use libquota.
I don't understand - surely edquota and repquota go through your
proplib interface now?
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |