[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: libquota proposal
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:14:10PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:45:38PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> > > Everywhere? If "quota2" is going to be the standard quota and the old one
> > > is going to be deprecated, then it is better to call it "quota" and
> > > the old one.
> > At this point, in the source 'quota1' is used for the old
> > quota format, 'quota2' for the new one and 'quota' for the few things
> > that are common.
> Everything outside the kernel should be in the last category, though.
exept those that deal directly with the filesystem datas (edquota,
quotacheck, repquota for quota1, newfs, fsck_ffs, tunefs and fsdb for
For others, that's fine with me
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |