Re: openat/fstatat functions implementation

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:45:20PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> I think there was not enough time spent designing those syscalls.

We have two options:

 1) ignore those badly done syscalls completely, since they are only
    convenience, but not essentially needed
 2) implement all of them just as the stupid standard says

Everything else, while technically more corect, would be a waste of time,
IMHO.

Martin