[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: openat/fstatat functions implementation
On Oct 5, 12:59am, martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: openat/fstatat functions implementation
| On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 10:45:20PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > I think there was not enough time spent designing those syscalls.
| We have two options:
| 1) ignore those badly done syscalls completely, since they are only
| convenience, but not essentially needed
| 2) implement all of them just as the stupid standard says
| Everything else, while technically more corect, would be a waste of time,
Not that I am a strong advocate of this but:
3) Design and implement the proper set, then provide compatibility by
defining the busted functions in terms of the correct ones.
Main Index |
Thread Index |