Re: openat/fstatat functions implementation

[Adam Hamsik <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Oct,Saturday 3 2009, at 1:57 AM, Adam Hamsik wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sep,Thursday 24 2009, at 8:11 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > ZFS uses openat/fstatat[1] function as a thread-safe version of a  
> > > open/
> > > fstat calls. These functions are part of a POSIX definition.  
> > > Attached
> > > patch add support for openat and fstatat system calls. After initial
> > > commit I would like to add support for all other *at system calls  
> > > but
> > > currently only openat and fstatat are needed for zfs. This patch  
> > > needs
> > > more testing still, I'm building distribution with it and I'm  
> > > going to
> > > test it later.
> > >
> > > Do you have any comments ?
>
> Here is last version of openat/fstatat diff I have written atf tests  
> for it and tested my patch by doing build(checks namei) and zfs 
> (checks openat/fstatat) + atf tests. Both cases were working. Can  
> put these syscalls in ?

As usual I forgot to attach patch file here is it

Attachment: nameiat.diff
Description: Binary data

Regards

Adam.