[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Implementation of POSIX shared memory objects
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:41:42AM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> ad%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:13:17AM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> > > Any reads/writes? Apart from greater file-system overhead (as opposed to
> > > aobj), I think it can involve disks. :)
> > tmpfs == swap backed uao
> Right, but this is dependency on tmpfs, which one might not necessary want
> to have. I think it is not that friendly for embedded devices too.
You know that Linux is doing that for general SysV IPC? I don't think it
is a worse deal than another arbitrary memory sink in kernel space. It
is not even guarantied to be simpler in the kernel, if you also want to
allow swap backing.
Main Index |
Thread Index |