[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Implementation of POSIX shared memory objects
yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > While permitted by POSIX,
> > it would be significantly slower.
> which operations are significantly slower? why?
Any reads/writes? Apart from greater file-system overhead (as opposed to
aobj), I think it can involve disks. :)
> YAMAMOTO Takashi
P.S. It seems there is a race condition in uao_resize() from patch, I will
fix it shortly.
Main Index |
Thread Index |