[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Status of revivesa
matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost> wrote:
> matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost> wrote:
> > We had accidentally broken libpthread compatibility (after move of
> > some functionality to librt) in -current. It was noticed 6 months
> > later, by one developer. So extent of the problem is probably not that
> > large.
> > this is entirely false.
> > there was a PR logged by a user 1-2 weeks afterwards.
> Perhaps make sure that we are talking about same problem, before saying
> what is true or false? Otherwise, we can both call each other liars. :)
> Breakage was in January, PR was created in May, thus 5 (sorry, not 6)
> months. Well, maybe somebody noticed it earlier, but I am not aware of any
> earlier PR.
> hmm, i can't find the PR or the original report off hand.
> however, it came about 3 weeks after the GCC update in feb, about
> 1-2 weeks after the pthread_mutex_t change was made. i remember
> it very well because GCC update was initially blamed.
> ie, a user noticed this problem fairly quickly.
And here we are talking about different problems, cf. PR/38657.
Main Index |
Thread Index |