[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
>> So I guess it's generally EM64T, but with some, presumably only a
>> few, processors not reporting themselves as EM64T-capable even
>> though they actually are.
> I've not 100% followed what you have checked, but it might just be
> that the old kernel doesn't know about the bit?
All of these have been with basically the same kernel code, certainly
the same when it comes to i386/i386/identcpu.c and
x86/include/specialreg.h. It's been the hardware that's different.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |