Re: 64-bit-ness?

[Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>]

>> So I guess it's generally EM64T, but with some, presumably only a
>> few, processors not reporting themselves as EM64T-capable even
>> though they actually are.
> I've not 100% followed what you have checked, but it might just be
> that the old kernel doesn't know about the bit?

All of these have been with basically the same kernel code, certainly
the same when it comes to i386/i386/identcpu.c and
x86/include/specialreg.h.  It's been the hardware that's different.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B