[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 06:13:58PM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> So I guess it's generally EM64T, but with some, presumably only a few,
> processors not reporting themselves as EM64T-capable even though they
> actually are.
I've not 100% followed what you have checked, but it might just
be that the old kernel doesn't know about the bit?
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |