Re: 64-bit-ness?

[David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost>]

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 06:13:58PM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> 
> So I guess it's generally EM64T, but with some, presumably only a few,
> processors not reporting themselves as EM64T-capable even though they
> actually are.

I've not 100% followed what you have checked, but it might just
be that the old kernel doesn't know about the bit?

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost