Remy van Elst <relst%relst.nl@localhost> writes: > Regarding pkgsrc-wip, the linter complained that a package that is > already in "regular" pkgsrc cannot be in -wip (with the same > name). For new packages I can try -wip, but this was an update for an > existing package. Or is that possible as well? It is not only completely possible -- it is the standard approach. If a checking tool is complaining about that, it has a bug. If you mean pkglint, I find that sometimes I have to wait almost 24h for bugs I report to be fixed rather than meeting the usual 4h service level agreement. But seriously: if you are finding something complaining about misc/foo has foo-1.3 wip/foo has foo-1.4 one of these is install (but not both, since they conflict) then please post specifics and we can sort out if there is a bug or if you have done something unusual.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature