Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 07:33:08PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:10:05AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:50:54PM +0000, maya%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
> >> > This is a violent hack, but rust builds are going to be a lot less flaky
> >> > on pkgbuild if we introduce
> >> > 
> >> > MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=no
> >> > 
> >> > to all Rust using things, on netbsd only.
> >> 
> >> Actually, rust did build on i386 but not amd64, and I don't know
> >> why; there's no rust directory left in bulklog. I guess one dependancy is
> >> failing, but I don't know how to find this.
> >
> > It did build:
> > [745/20283] Starting build of  rust-1.35.0nb1
> > [745/20283] Successfully built rust-1.35.0nb1
> >
> > And emacs too:
> > [1173/20283] Starting build of  emacs26-26.2
> > [1173/20283] Successfully built emacs26-26.2
> 
> Did you change the config of /dev/random, or something about rust's use
> of /dev/random?

No, I configured more random sources.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--