Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:

>> > It did build:
>> > [745/20283] Starting build of  rust-1.35.0nb1
>> > [745/20283] Successfully built rust-1.35.0nb1
>> >
>> > And emacs too:
>> > [1173/20283] Starting build of  emacs26-26.2
>> > [1173/20283] Successfully built emacs26-26.2
>> 
>> Did you change the config of /dev/random, or something about rust's use
>> of /dev/random?
>
> No, I configured more random sources.

Thanks - so that means the randomness troubles with rust shouldn't really
be an issue any more on pkgbuild, and now we're seeing the next layer of
bugs.

Agreed that i386 is being ignored more and more by upstreams.   At least
the rust people made sure it works well on VAX :-) !