Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> writes:

> Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:10:05AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:50:54PM +0000, maya%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
>>> > This is a violent hack, but rust builds are going to be a lot less flaky
>>> > on pkgbuild if we introduce
>>> > 
>>> > MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=no
>>> > 
>>> > to all Rust using things, on netbsd only.
>>> 
>>> Actually, rust did build on i386 but not amd64, and I don't know
>>> why; there's no rust directory left in bulklog. I guess one dependancy is
>>> failing, but I don't know how to find this.
>>
>> It did build:
>> [745/20283] Starting build of  rust-1.35.0nb1
>> [745/20283] Successfully built rust-1.35.0nb1
>>
>> And emacs too:
>> [1173/20283] Starting build of  emacs26-26.2
>> [1173/20283] Successfully built emacs26-26.2

I looked at the most recent bulk reports, and it seems that rust built
on both i386 and amd64, but librsvg failed on i386, and thus no emacs.