Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 01:33:38PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >> > > mutt-220.127.116.11 >> > >> > Not sure if people want to move to mutt-devel... >> >> And the "vulnerability" listed here is IMHO pretty minor. > > Well, I disagree. If you get a signed message, you should know which > part is signed and which wasn't. This is exactly the kind of issue which is left to user choice. Some people care, some people don't - and withdrawing build support for everyone is overboard.
Description: PGP signature