[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Unable to build modular-xorg-server, now difference between make & bmake
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Why are you using "bmake" under NetBSD? NetBSD's own "make" works just
fine. It looks like you boot-strapped under NetBSD which isn't necessary.
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
I wanted to ask what was the difference between make and bmake. Are
they the same in NetBSD but different in other OSes?
'bmake' is the same as NetBSD's make. I've always assumed the 'b'
prefix was notating that this version of make conformed to the BSD
Linux uses GNU-make as it's default 'make'.
The pkgsrc system was originally developed on NetBSD and its makefiles
make extensive use of BSD-specific features, which is why you need
'bmake' on non-NetBSD hosts in order to build stuff in pkgsrc.
I see where NetBSD pkgsrc would need bmake to make sure of
compatibility when pkgsrc is ported outside NetBSD.
I ran "man" on NetBSD make, pkgsrc bmake, and Linux make, noticed that
the use of "+=" in variable assignments showed up in man pages for
NetBSD make, pkgsrc bmake, but not Linux make.
That would be one of the BSD specific features.
I could conceivably bootstrap pkgsrc in Linux just to get bmake even
if I don't want to use the pkgsrc framework in Linux, or I could find
the source code and build. Now I find pmake through a Google search
on BSD make vs GNU make, and I see, by running
that there are several makes including pmake, which may be what I was
pmake is another make, looks like it was developed by the BSD team
for 4.4BSD, it might even be a recent ancestor to NetBSD's make (and
Main Index |
Thread Index |