[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Dependencies of meta-pkgs/gnome [was Re: Adding a gnome-lite package]
On 04/23/10 13:59, Julio Merino wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Jens Rehsack<rehsack%googlemail.com@localhost>
If all dependencies are optional, there is no point in having a meta
Fully agree (and that's why not proposed!).
But introducing 5 new packages which differ slightly wouldn't make sense to
me when 2 new packages and 2-3 options would do fine.
Package options, specially those that change dependencies, are evil.
Finally - nearly all build time options change something in the
dependencies. That's what they are made for.
I repeat: I do not see any reason for introducing a lot meta-pkgs:
- gnome-lite, ok
- gnome-pkgsrc, ok (even if gnome-NetBSD would match better)
But gnome-suggested or gnome-supported? Where does it end?
I don't think having a firefox option is reasonable - it wasn't my example.
Much more: I don't think can choose from a bunch of window managers is
reasonable. But I think, it's more reasonable having an option to choose a
window manager than having a new meta-pkg for it.
I'm not familiar with packaging gnome, what makes it hard for me giving good
Main Index |
Thread Index |