[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ntpdate(8) and unbound(8) dependencies during boot
Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 07:03:53PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > Which sounds like "the right approach is not yet widely agreed on so
> > NetBSD being leading edge in paranoia is not necessarily helpful".
> Nothing of this is special to NetBSD, besides the question how we can
> work around the issue in our way to configure startup.
Like you say, this isn't a NetBSD problem. The approach in
looks reasonable at first glance as an option to not hard-code IP
running this at boot time may help as well
unbound-control set_option val-permissive-mode: yes
then after ntpd has started up run this
unbound-control set_option val-permissive-mode: no
Yes work around's, but work around's work by definition.
The thread from that link has a few other suggestions, but this one
seemed most elegant (insofar as a workaround could be considered
Main Index |
Thread Index |