NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: NetBSD remains stagnant as Charles Hannum said?
Hi netbsd-users@
Reference:
> From: =?UTF-8?Q?rafra=C3=AEchissant?=
> <jorgeassembler1%outlook.com@localhost>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 05:25:16 -0800 (PST) (14:25 CET)
> To: netbsd-users%NetBSD.org@localhost
=?UTF-8?Q?rafra=C3=AEchissant?= wrote:
> NetBSD remains stagnant as Charles Hannum said in 2006?
>
> Does the other BSD's were also stagnant at this time?
> If yes, remain stagnant?
> Charles Hannum, please answer, I ask this especially for you because I read
> several statements that have been answered for you on a topic, claims that
> second you were false.
outlook.com seems a troll domain:
2 weeks back someone (Bcc'd) on a FreeBSD.org thread also noted another
troll was @outlook.com.
http://outlook.com redirects to a Microsoft user site
https://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&ct=1389825061&rver=6.1.6206.0&sa=1&ntprob=-1&wp=MBI_SSL_SHARED&wreply=https:%2F%2Fmail.live.com%2F%3Fowa%3D1%26owasuffix%3Dowa%252f&id=64855&snsc=1&cbcxt=mail
With:
Multiple slow links, typical of commercial sites that harvest
users of free logins. +
Rubbish from Microsoft:
<!-- PreprocessInfo: BTSA007:RR1BLDF051, -- Version:
15,500,24000,0 -->
(Probably to annoy Firefox users toward using
MonopolySoft's Explorer browser.)
So I omitted cc'ing to @outlook.com.
Maybe netbsd.org could block @outlook.com ?
Temporarily in my personal procmail discard filter:
^From: .+@outlook.com>
NetBSD is Not dead,
eg NetBSD's urtwn wlan driver was adopted by FreeBSD but Net
has newer code than Free, last I looked 1 or 2 months back.
Long may *BSDs (& Linux etc) thrive & co-operate :-)
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ".
Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index