[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: named issue
On Mar 28, 1:47am, Al wrote:
} On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} > In article <20121207211739.GA1378%kyyhky.embedtronics.fi@localhost>,
} > Jukka Marin <jmarin%embedtronics.fi@localhost> wrote:
} >> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:07:31PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
} >>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:48:07 -0500 (EST)
} >>> Al <al%familysafeinternet.com@localhost> wrote:
} >>>> Most things seem faster and the system seems much more responsive after
} >>>> switching to NetBSD 6, however named seems to take much more cpu, in fact
} >>>> at times it maxes out the system. Does anyone have any ideas on what I
} >>>> could do to improve performance?
} >>> This is likely to be not an Amiga problem and I don't know what has
} >>> changed, besides the version.
} From everything that I read, I would agree.
} >>> So I'm crossposting to netbsd-users. Maybe somebody knows. :)
} >> DNS attack perhaps?
} I don't think so. When the amount of incoming email goes up, then I see
} the issue with named.
} However, I can't say for sure because when ever I run: tcpdump -c 250 -n
} port 53. I get: tcpdump: no suitable device found
Then change your tcpdump command to:
tcpdump -c 250 -n -i <interface> port 53
} > Or threading issue. Try compiling without threads.
} I tried to build bind96 from the pkgsrc, but it always ends in an error:
} checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
} configure: error: in `/usr/pkgsrc/net/bind96/work/bind-9.6-ESV-R7-P3':
} configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
} See `config.log' for more details
} *** Error code 1
Well, what does config.log say?
}-- End of excerpt from Al
Main Index |
Thread Index |