[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: UDP Lite Support on NetBSD 6.0
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:10:11PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> But in all seriousness, the NetBSD way is to have a proper
> implementation, so it's inconceivable that a protocol is implemented
> without that support being clear in the headers.
It ought to be, right?
I've been personally bitten once or twice by the NetBSD's relaxed
interpretation of the headers. Trivial, but annoying, especially if it
requires unnecessary M4 voodoo.
Main Index |
Thread Index |