Re: [Signal handler] Bug or feature ?

[BERTRAND Joël <joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost>]

Pongthep Kulkrisada a écrit :
> * BERTRAND Jol (joel.bertrand%systella.fr@localhost) wrote:
> > volatile int flag;
> >
> > flag = 0;
> >
> > do
> > {
> >         code_retour = nanosleep(&temporisation,&temporisation);
> >         erreur = errno;
> >
> >         if (flag == 1)
> >         {
> >                 exit(0);
> >         }
> > } while((code_retour == -1)&&  (erreur == EINTR));
> >
> > SIGINT signal handler is :
> >
> > void
> > interruption1(int signal)
> > {
> >         flag = 1;
> >         return;
> > }
> I'm not sure what you are expecting to test.
> But the code should look like the attached main.c.
> Testing flag is redundant anyway.

	No, testing flag isn't redundant as I have to catch SIGINT and SIGUSR1. 
I have written a simple test to see what's happening with only one signal.

        Regards,

        JKB