[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ongoing major problems with NetBSD-5 and LOCKDEBUG on multi-core system (mfi(4) related?)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:59:47PM -0800, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> So if I understand correctly these calls from other subsystems are not
> in an interrupt context and if I remember correctly tsleep() should be
> fine in any normal driver ioctl() function (for a non-MPSAFE driver, if
> indeed its ioctl() function was in the device switch table), but clearly
> grabbing the KERNEL_LOCK() is the wrong thing to do for this case, at
> least without releasing it properly before the tsleep() call.
It's no problem calling tsleep() with the KERNEL_LOCK held: sleeping
functions will release the lock before sleep, and reaquire it after.
BTW, I run several dell PE2950 with this code and I don't have
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |