[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: static analysis on NetBSD code.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl%beer.org@localhost> wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2011, at 7:40 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:28:40AM +0100, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
>>> Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:48:26PM +0530, nikunj badjatya wrote:
>>>>> I myself have ran various Static Code Analyzers and found various issues
>>>>> with the NetBSD codes.
>>> First of all, the plural of code is code. You look like an idiot when you
>>> write "NetBSD codes." (I'm responding to the previous H1B poster here, not
@Mr Fritz : Thank you for your comments. You have shown your quality
sir, The very highest. !
>> I agree with most of the other content of your message, but I think you
>> could have skipped the swipe about what you presume is nikunj's immigration
@Mr Herb : Thank you for showing little maturity. yes, English is not
my native language.
> What actually caught me was the fixation on the word 'codes', as if assuming
> that english was his native language... I don't think you look like an idiot
> when you write "NetBSD codes". You just look like someone who isn't a native
> english speaker and are for the most part doing a pretty stellar job of
> communicating. I think you look more like an idiot for being critical of
> grammar/pluralization and so I pretty much discounted the rest of Mr.
> Wuehler's post.
@Mr Thor : I am a newbie. I suppose this will answer all which I have written.
Do not spoil the Image "mailing lists" have had on their users. The
same thing can be communicated in different way. If you are good in
English ofcourse. !!
and yeah ..ML's are for problem discussion and not for story telling.
Main Index |
Thread Index |