Re: static analysis on NetBSD code.

To: nikunj badjatya <nikunjbadjatya%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: static analysis on NetBSD code.
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:14:52 -0500

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 03:48:26PM +0530, nikunj badjatya wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I myself have ran various Static Code Analyzers and found various issues
> with the NetBSD codes.

I think you mean "what these analyzers claim are various issues with
the NetBSD code".

I have little trust for static analyzers other than Coverity (which
must be used with care) and possibly the rumored IBM "BEAM".

Thor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: static analysis on NetBSD code.
  - From: Fritz Wuehler

References:
- static analysis on NetBSD code.
  - From: nikunj badjatya

Prev by Date: Re: Upgrading NetBSD in-place in a clean way
Next by Date: Re: static analysis on NetBSD code.
Previous by Thread: Re: static analysis on NetBSD code.
Next by Thread: Re: static analysis on NetBSD code.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index