"Aaron J. Grier" <agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost> writes: > I was my understanding that background fsck uses snapshots, which are > orthogonal to softdeps. perhaps I am incorrect? I believe that snapshots are for backups, and background fsck requires a fs that can operate in any state that could have been created by power loss. wapbl(4) gets most of the benefit, but being able to verify/fix consistency while opearting would be nice.
Description: PGP signature