Re: Why do an MMU-Less Port of NetBSD?

[Masao Uebayashi <uebayasi%gmail.com@localhost>]

While I have no real need of uCnetbsd, I believe the work is worth
trying.  I think MMU-less is similar to what RUMP does now.

Masao

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Charles Nelson 
<embsyspro%hotmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>
>  Hi All,
>
> I have project in mind that requires porting NetBSD to an MMU-less MCU.  It 
> appears that no one else has made a real attempt at doing an MMU-less port so 
> I'm now asking myself is there a real need to do this?  The MCU I have in 
> mind is very popular and a port of uClinux already exists for it.
>
> Any opinions?
>
> Thanks,
>
> CLN
>
>
>