Re: FFS snapshot on 5.0_STABLE pondering

[Adam Hoka <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:06:57 -0400
"Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:02:56AM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:54:37 -0400
> > "Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost> wrote:
> > 
> > > Just a quick question: Is it intended behaviour for a snapshot created
> > > on 5.0_STABLE via fssconfig that the directory hierarchy inside also
> > > extends to the mounted directories beneath? Even without a changed
> > > device id? There is nothing about that in the manpages.
> > > (...)
> > pax/rsync uses st_dev to check what device its on, and it will be fss0 for
> > both /usr and /usr/src I'm affraid. So short answer: yes.
> > 
> 
> And /usr/src will also be "snapshot"(ted)? Under the reign of /usr? (to
> stay with the example)
> 
> Thanks Adam.

No idea. :-)


-- 
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability