Re: Xen 3.3 vs NetBSD/i386 (off topic)

[Adam Hoka <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 10:05:47 -0400
Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 01:12:28PM +0200, Adam Hoka wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:27:34 -0400
> > Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 03:01:09AM +0000, Dima Veselov wrote:
> > > > Sorry if i wasn't accurate enough. NetBSD 5.0.1 comes with non-PAE
> > > > DOM0 stock kernels and it won't build with "options PAE". So the
> > > > premise is non-working 5.0.1/Xen 3.3 setup.
> > > 
> > > [When posting to the NetBSD mailing lists:
> > >   1) please don't top-post, it robs other readers of context.
> > 
> > Funny, you just did that yesterday. :-)
> 
> Where, when?  If I did, I shouldn't have!  And please, when posting
> to the NetBSD mailing lists, wrap your lines at 78 characters (I've
> reformatted your message from one gigantic block with no line endings
> into something readable in a character oriented mail client...)

Haha, I should have remained silent. :-)
I will see if I can setup a filter for my bad habit.

> > Sure, but thats an unsupported configuration, so no-go on production
> > systems. amd64 is not always a way to go either. Can we supply a
> > non-PAE Xen 3.3 or it is not supported anymore by upstream? (this
> > question goes to everyone with xen-fu)
> 
> Support for non-PAE PV guests was droppd in Xen 3.3.  If a "supported"
> configuration is a must, then the only way to get it will be with an
> amd64 dom0.
> 
> Thor


-- 
Adam Hoka <Adam.Hoka%Gmail.com@localhost>
Adam Hoka <ahoka%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Adam Hoka <ahoka%MirBSD.de@localhost>