NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: dump won't dump an fss snapshot on netbsd-5
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 05:28:34PM -0400, Louis Guillaume wrote:
>
> Hi Juergen,
>
> Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:13:09PM -0400, Louis Guillaume wrote:
> >>I just updated the machine connected to my tape drive from netbsd-4
> >>(stable) to netbsd-5 (stable). Now dump will not back up my fss
> >>snapshots...
>
> >
> >The /dev/fss? devices will not allow multiple opens. To dump a snapshot
> >please use the -x / -X flags. In your example it would be:
> >
> > dump -L maat-home -b 32 -0eautf /dev/nrst0 -x /var/tmp/maat-home /home
> >
>
>
> This appears to work properly, however I have no indication that a
> snapshot was made or even used aside from this:
>
> [16:42:52 EDT] DUMP: Dumping a snapshot of /dev/rld0g (/home) to
> /dev/nrst0
>
> Is it safe to assume that I don't have to create the snapshot with
> fssconfig first? And that dump takes care of that for us? It's not
> really clear in dump(8).
Yes and yes. You could run "fssconfig -lv" and "systat vmstat" during
dump to see a fss device working ...
> Another thing - fss in general (both via dump and by itself) is
> considered "experimental" but I haven't had much trouble with this until
> now. Is this because there has been limited testing? Limited resources
> to maintain/develop it? Perhaps it's not as stable on ports other than
> i386.
Limited testing. While I'm running snapshot dumps daily on all my
NetBSD machines I'm not aware of others using it on a regular basis.
> I consider this a very important feature and would like to see it
> considered "stable". It would also be good to get rid of some ironic
> (albeit funny) documentation in the manual, such as:
>
> -x snap-backup
> Use a snapshot with snap-backup as backup for this dump. See
> fss(4) for more details. Snapshot support is experimental. Be
> sure you have a backup before you use it.
>
> ... from the dump(8) page.
This is NOT meant ironic -- be sure you have a (non-snapshot) dump before
you try it.
> Thanks for your help. Any further clarifications would be most appreciated.
--
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig
(Germany)
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index