NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: systrace replacement



In article <64D81CD0-F141-496C-AE80-EE16CD625CDC%webkeks.org@localhost>,
Jonathan Schleifer  <js-netbsd-users%webkeks.org@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Hi!
>
>I already asked for a replacement when systrace was removed from the  
>tree. The answer back then was a bit unclear, it was something like  
>"we have something in the kernel that could provide something similar,  
>but we don't have any userland tool to configure that". Now, as NetBSD  
>5 isn't so far away anymore, I wanted to ask this again, so I know if  
>I need an update plan or whether I have to skip NetBSD 5.0 and  
>propably even 5.x completely, or if there has been any change recently  
>introducing something similar? If not, will something similar be in  
>NetBSD 6?
>
>PS: I know that there are some flaws in systrace. Still, it's better  
>than nothing. There's no need to start that discussion again, as we  
>already had it back then when it was removed. But a replacement for  
>systrace doesn't necessarily have to have the same issues. For  
>example, SELinux doesn't have them, either.

What are you using systrace for?

christos



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index