NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: systrace replacement
In article <64D81CD0-F141-496C-AE80-EE16CD625CDC%webkeks.org@localhost>,
Jonathan Schleifer <js-netbsd-users%webkeks.org@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Hi!
>
>I already asked for a replacement when systrace was removed from the
>tree. The answer back then was a bit unclear, it was something like
>"we have something in the kernel that could provide something similar,
>but we don't have any userland tool to configure that". Now, as NetBSD
>5 isn't so far away anymore, I wanted to ask this again, so I know if
>I need an update plan or whether I have to skip NetBSD 5.0 and
>propably even 5.x completely, or if there has been any change recently
>introducing something similar? If not, will something similar be in
>NetBSD 6?
>
>PS: I know that there are some flaws in systrace. Still, it's better
>than nothing. There's no need to start that discussion again, as we
>already had it back then when it was removed. But a replacement for
>systrace doesn't necessarily have to have the same issues. For
>example, SELinux doesn't have them, either.
What are you using systrace for?
christos
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index