NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: qmail or postfix for a mail server ?
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, James K. Lowden wrote:
>
> > Francisco Valladolid wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:49 PM, James K. Lowden
> > > <jklowden%schemamania.org@localhost> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Francisco Valladolid wrote:
> > > > > I need hear the voice of experience in this field and some spam
> > > > > techniques, maybe SpamAssasin, spamd(from openbsd) etc.
> > > >
> > > > I installed spamd a year ago and have only good things to say. It cut
> > > > down the number of messages I had to scan by 90%.
> > > >
> > >
> > > it_s possible use exim with spamd (and PF) together for controlling
> > > spam. ?
> > >
> > > How reliable if Exim in the real life ?
> >
> > Dunno, sorry. I'm using postfix and am completely happy with it.
>
> I've had the occasional issue with spamassassin's spamd going
> into a non responsive state, but not any exim issues.
Long-time Exim user, here. I would describe Exim as robust and reliable;
carrier class, if you like, and used by many large orgainsations from its
birthplace (University of Cambridge) to many ISPs. The Exim user's list
is very helpful, too.
Regards,
/DHS
--
David
dhs%chromiq.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index