Re: Build error when crypto and swcrypto are omitted from kernel

[Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>]

On Sun, 10 May 2020, Michael van Elst wrote:

> paul%whooppee.com@localhost (Paul Goyette) writes:
>
> > > Well, 90%+ of the effort has already been expended, so why not?
>
> 90%+ is probably the time needed to test optional builds in the future.
>
> > FWIW, I have just successfully completed my build of my custom kernel
> > (and an entire ``build.sh release'') and it correctly included the
> > rijndael stuff (even without the two {,sw}crypto pseudo-devices).
>
> And I'd like to talk to Martin, since 100% of the task is done if
> we just add the missing dependency without the option. Even an
> #ifdef SMALL could be easier to maintain.

Yep, that would work, too.  I'm open to either approach, just would
like to move forward.


+--------------------+--------------------------+-----------------------+
| Paul Goyette       | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:     |
| (Retired)          | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul%whooppee.com@localhost     |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette%netbsd.org@localhost   |
+--------------------+--------------------------+-----------------------+