Re: build.sh distribution failure for evbarm

[Chavdar Ivanov <ci4ic4%gmail.com@localhost>]

It would benefit from some clarification regarding the ARM ecosystem
indeed. So far I've always used ' evbarm' for my RPI builds and
wondered if I can skip the building of the rest.

Anyway, with 'evbearmv6hf-el' the build completed successfully.

On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 19:42, Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> wrote:
>
>
> Nick Hudson <nick.hudson%gmx.co.uk@localhost> writes:
>
> > RPI should use evbearmv6hf-el
> > RPI2 should use evbearmv7hf-el
> >
> > I'm thinking evbarm should alias to evbearmv7hf-el these days
>
> Maybe, but another theory is that we should have a bunch of aliases and
> that -a evbarm should just error out, because whoever invoked it that
> way doesn't have a clear view of what they want.  And we should enable
> RELEASEMACHINEDIR being equal to the alias by default, so that multiple
> builds don't collide so much.
>


-- 
----