[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: build.sh distribution failure for evbarm
It would benefit from some clarification regarding the ARM ecosystem
indeed. So far I've always used ' evbarm' for my RPI builds and
wondered if I can skip the building of the rest.
Anyway, with 'evbearmv6hf-el' the build completed successfully.
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 19:42, Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> wrote:
> Nick Hudson <nick.hudson%gmx.co.uk@localhost> writes:
> > RPI should use evbearmv6hf-el
> > RPI2 should use evbearmv7hf-el
> > I'm thinking evbarm should alias to evbearmv7hf-el these days
> Maybe, but another theory is that we should have a bunch of aliases and
> that -a evbarm should just error out, because whoever invoked it that
> way doesn't have a clear view of what they want. And we should enable
> RELEASEMACHINEDIR being equal to the alias by default, so that multiple
> builds don't collide so much.
Main Index |
Thread Index |