Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Possible regression in wm(4)?



On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:54:56AM +0100, Bert Kiers wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:31:59AM +0900, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > > But still no traffic.
> > 
> > Oh...., the dmesg is as expected, but the behavior is not.
> > Hmm, sorry, could you give me the following information?
> >     + "intrctl list" result on NetBSD-8
> >       - before trying traffic and after it
> >     - full dmesg on NetBSD-8 which boot with "-xv" option
> >     - full dmesg on NetBSD-7 (which boot -xv if you can)
> >     - "acpidump -dt" result
> 
> Most of this you can find in http://netbsd.itsx.net/kern52717/
> The n8 directory contains the output of the original NetBSD-8
> kernel, not with any of the patches.  If that was not your plan,
> please tell me.
> 
> Not the intrctl output yet, since I only have NetBSD-7 userland.
> Building that userland now, so that too will be there in a little
> while.

The ouput of intrctl list is now there.

By the way, ifconfig -v shows an increasing number of queue drops.
What are those?

root@yvresse:~# uptime
 1:44PM  up  2:04, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.12, 2.49
root@yvresse:~# while true ; do ifconfig -v wm1 |grep drops ; sleep 10 ; done
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20062 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20079 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20101 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20111 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20136 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20165 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20192 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20201 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20219 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20235 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20246 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20252 queue drops
	input: 50 packets, 7200 bytes, 20273 queue drops
									
Tcpdump -i wm1 -n does not show them.  I think that is about the number
of incoming packets I would expect.  I double verified ipf is disabled.

Grtnx,
-- 
B*E*R*T


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index