Re: npf bug(?)

To: Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: npf bug(?)
From: 6bone%6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de@localhost
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 11:16:15 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Christos Zoulas wrote:

I would add some rules to block the ipv4 traffic, except when it comes from
your 'known hosts' to your 'known interfaces and ports'.

The DNS and the 6to4 service are offered for free usage. There are norestrictions on certain IP networks. I guess the reassambling in suchcases is problematic. That's why I would like to switch it off. There are alsono firewall rules for IPv4.



Regards
Uwe

Follow-Ups:
- Re: npf bug(?)
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- npf bug(?)
  - From: 6bone
- Re: npf bug(?)
  - From: 6bone
- Re: npf bug(?)
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: npf bug(?)
  - From: 6bone
- Re: npf bug(?)
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: Automated report: NetBSD-current/i386 build failure
Next by Date: Re: npf bug(?)
Previous by Thread: Re: npf bug(?)
Next by Thread: Re: npf bug(?)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index