Re: bind -> unbound/nsd

[Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>]

On 19/08/2016 07:16, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> - Needs additional components nsd, openDNSSEC, ldns to match bind's
>   functionality

Maybe we should take a step back and consider what functionality we need
rather than trying to match bind.

For example, I would use nsd on exactly one machine in my environment,
my public facing DNS server which is exactly where it belongs.

On the other hand, all my other BSD machines run unbound as a local
caching resolver.

I'm all for stripping out bind and putting unbound in its place, but I
would suggest to keep nsd in pkgsrc along with bind (even though it
would make my task of updating my ERLITE easier as compiling on it for
pkgsrc blows chunks).

Roy