agr issue in netbsd-7

[6bone%6bone.informatik.uni-leipzig.de@localhost]

hello,

I tried to configure a port channel (agr0).
When I configure the port channel only with bnx0 or only with bnx1 
everything works. If I use bnx0 and bnx1, the Cisco switch sets one of 
the two links to suspended mode.


bnx0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        capabilities=3f00<IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx>
        capabilities=3f00<UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx>
        enabled=0
        ec_capabilities=7<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU>
        ec_enabled=0
        address: 00:19:b9:b0:f1:45
        media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,master)
        status: active

bnx1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        capabilities=3f00<IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx>
        capabilities=3f00<UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx>
        enabled=0
        ec_capabilities=7<VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU>
        ec_enabled=0
        address: 00:19:b9:b0:f1:43
        media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
        status: active

agr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        capabilities=3f00<IP4CSUM_Rx,IP4CSUM_Tx,TCP4CSUM_Rx,TCP4CSUM_Tx>
        capabilities=3f00<UDP4CSUM_Rx,UDP4CSUM_Tx>
        enabled=0
        agrport: bnx0, flags=0x3<COLLECTING,DISTRIBUTING>
        agrport: bnx1, flags=0x0
        address: 00:19:b9:b0:f1:45
        inet 139.18.25.36 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 139.18.25.39
        inet6 fe80::219:b9ff:feb0:f145%agr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6


The cisco catalyst reports:

Channel group 4 neighbors

Partner's information:

                  LACP port                        Admin  Oper   Port 
Port
Port      Flags   Priority  Dev ID          Age    key    Key    Number 
State
Gi7/44    SA      32768     0019.b9b0.f145  14s    0x0    0xD0   0x1     0x3D
Gi7/46    SA      32768     0019.b9b0.f143  14s    0x0    0xD0   0x4     0xD


Maybe the problem is the device ID. I think the device ID should be the 
same for all ports in a port channel.


Can someone take a look at the problem?


Thank you for your efforts


Regards
Uwe